Sweet Discord

Sync Worlds for PC, Mac, and Modern Tech

The Star Wars Sequel Dilemma

In 2015, Disney bought Lucasfilm for $4.05 billion and announced plans to launch Star Wars: Episode VII in 2017 with J.J Abrams directing the film of a new trilogy which will be based off the existing continuity. However, fans worry that this means we’ll only see 3+ movies from one franchise…what do you think?

The Star Wars Sequel Dilemma is a question that many people have been asking. Many people are wondering when the next trilogy will come out, and who will be in it. Read more in detail here: new star wars trilogy 2022 cast.

The Star Wars Sequel Dilemma

The Problem of a Star Wars Prequel



The “Mando-verse,” or the multiple Mandalorian spin-offs handled by Dave Filoni and Jon Favreau, is building up to the sequel trilogy, as we all know. This is a complete blunder. Even if you like the sequel trilogy and don’t want it to be de-canonized or disregarded, The Mandalorian’s earlier uncertainty was a benefit. Every indication as to what the Imperial remnants were up to left everyone free to speculate and believe whatever they pleased. For the most part, I choose to ignore the sequel trilogy. They’re not great films, and I’ve been enjoying Disney and Hasbro’s absence of sequel-related stuff for the last several years. We’ve all made our peace, and I don’t believe there’s much more to say about them at this time, so I try to concentrate on the excellent Star Wars stuff that Disney+ has been providing. However, the sequels’ reaffirmation of the plot makes this more difficult. Because of this, I’m not going to boycott The Mandalorian or any other planned series. However, I’d want to explain why I believe Disney and Lucasfilm made such a bad (and simply, stupid) decision. 

The Problem of a Star Wars Prequel

I have a sneaking suspicion that the “creatives” at Disney and Lucasfilm believe they can save the sequels. They presumably believe that in 10 or 20 years, people will adore them as much as they love the prequels today. I can only presume that the thinking process here was that the Mando-verse might do something similar to The Clone Wars by “fixing” the sequels in the same way that the prequels were “fixed” in that series. However, there are a few flaws with that theory. While many people were dissatisfied or simply despised the prequels, I have always embraced them. The prequels aren’t as excellent as the originals, and I agree with the most of the criticisms thrown at them, especially Episode II. The prequels, unlike the Disney trilogy, were a labor of love. They are dripping with George Lucas’ Star Wars philosophy and flair. The essential concepts of camaraderie and sacrifice remain, and some viewers regard the clunky speech and dubious CGI as benefits rather than drawbacks. Meanwhile, it has been often noted that the successors lacked the same creative zeal. They have superior CGI aspects (although 10-15 years later), but the designs are less distinctive. It everything has a lot less personality now. What are the subjects that this new trilogy tackles? Rey is never tempted to be self-centered. Because Rey’s sole family is the Emperor, and she doesn’t depend on her friends for anything, it’s not about family or friendship. 

The Problem of a Star Wars Prequel

The prequels’ underlying notion is sound; it’s in their implementation that problems appear. The idea of investigating Anakin’s descent into the dark side is popular, and Palpatine’s ascension to power is fascinating to see. I distinctly recall going to watch Revenge of the Sith with my father in the cinema. We assumed it was the last Star Wars film, and we had a great time viewing it. I was just ten years old when the film was out, but I remember how I felt when the Chancellor informed Anakin about Darth Plagueis. It was unlike anything I’d ever seen in Star Wars, or for that matter anywhere else. Although the prequels contain clunky language and poorly planned action scenes (particularly when compared to the originals), they elicit intense emotions. Every aspect of the production was created with passion, and as a consequence, it elicits a tremendous reaction from the audience. Even if some people dislike it, I’d prefer that over the tiredness and dullness I had when watching The Rise of Skywalker. The Clone Wars accomplished the right thing by focusing on the right topics and giving the prequels’ characters greater depth. Anakin was a superb Jedi, a loyal friend, and a loving (though possessive and jealous) spouse, according to the animated series. This just adds to the horror of his demise, and we get to experience the war’s ramifications from more perspectives than the movies could possibly cover. According to Revenge of the Sith, “heroes on both sides” of the fight, Republic and Separatist, exist. The Clone Wars, on the other hand, brings this notion to life by creating Separatist personalities and delving into their beliefs and motivations. That’s what the show succeeds at: drawing inspiration from the movies and fleshing out previously unexplored areas to create a more complete image. After learning why the clones carried out Order 66, for example, it makes a lot more sense. The clones’ diverse personalities and opinions are possibly the show’s greatest triumph, transforming a literal army of nothing characters that may as well be droids into humans. It’s heartbreaking to see what happens to the 501st under Ahsoka’s command towards the conclusion of the program. 

The Problem of a Star Wars Prequel

That’s all there is to it. Because the tale doesn’t function, the sequels don’t need to be developed or examined from a new perspective. It’s muddled, uncertain of itself, a rehash of better content, and it has nothing on its mind or to say. Because we don’t learn much about Rey as a person, and she’s unstoppable, she grows worse as a character as the story progresses. It’s difficult to be worried about someone you don’t know, particularly if they seem to be invincible. Many people have expressed dissatisfaction with Anakin’s depiction in the prequels. Even still, I doubt anybody would describe him as immaculate or omnipotent. It’s no accident that Rey is the only protagonist in a Star Wars trilogy to have both arms intact by the conclusion of the third installment. After all, giving both Anakin and Luke artificial hands was symbolic, and Rey isn’t a Skywalker, therefore I don’t believe she needed or should have lost a hand. However, the fact that she receives no significant bodily injuries throughout the three films demonstrates the producers’ reluctance to put her to the test, to really put these great abilities she allegedly has to the test. 


And there’s one more argument, the most convincing of them, why this was a mistake. We’ve already suffered through an episode of old guy Luke complaining and moping over his life’s failures. If you’re like me and seen all three movies, you’ve had your fill of misery. This plot doesn’t need to be reinforced, contextualized, or rehabilitated since it isn’t needed at all. I don’t believe Luke should be made invincible or eternal, as Lucasfilm did with Rey; he was already a flawed character who learnt from his errors and developed as a result of them. However, I despise how they portrayed him in the sequels and do not want to watch it again. Luke’s assassination of Grogu in Season 2 of The Mandalorian was a watershed moment for hope and atonement. It was, in its most basic level, Star Wars, encapsulating all the original trilogy stood for. This statement from Disney is painful because it rejects that optimism and substitutes it with an assurance of disaster for the characters we love and what they represent. I’ll continue to appreciate excellent Star Wars while ignoring the newer films as much as possible. That again, this is only the latest example of how Disney and Kathleen Kennedy seem to openly despise Star Wars and its fans. 

The “star wars sequels cast” is a difficult decision to make. It’s not easy deciding what the next Star Wars movie will be, but it’s something that has to happen eventually.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the sequel trilogy no longer canon?

A: No, the sequel trilogy is still considered to be canon by Disney and Lucasfilm.

Are the Star Wars sequels canon?

A: It depends on what you are asking. If you are looking for the official Star Wars movies that have been produced, then yes those would be considered canon. However if one were to ask about an obscure novel or game released after the original trilogy, that is not officially sanctioned by Disney but has a large following of its own, it will also not count as part of any official continuity because it falls outside of Disneys scope and control

Will there be another Star Wars sequel trilogy?

Related Tags

  • star wars sequels are terrible
  • star wars sequel trilogy reboot
  • star wars sequel trilogy not canon
  • new star wars trilogy 2023
  • star wars movies